- Patient education on what is acceptable to take and what to avoid;
- Use of a patient agreement;
- Tailoring the drug screen to the individual patient;
- Consultation with a SUD specialized toxicologist; and
- Chromatography testing.
When a positive test occurs, the clinician should discuss the positive result with the patient, adjust the treatment plan, and or order additional chromatography testing. However, absent the use of the above practices, which are described below, wrongly confronting the patient naturally puts the patient in a defensive position that could lead to a sense of ‘learned helplessness’.
How do you avoid ‘learned helplessness’ caused by a false accusation?
i. Educate the patient on what is acceptable to take and what to avoid. This education may sound daunting, however a laboratory that specializes in SUD monitoring can provide the clinician with easy to understand materials that facilitate patient education.
ii. Clearly communicate expectations via a patient agreement, whereby the patient acknowledges the need to seek permission prior to consuming any substance not deemed acceptable. The practice of the patient seeking ‘permission’ engages the patient in the coordination of the patient’s care and helps to ensure a common treatment plan across multiple medical professionals.
iii. Tailor the drug screen panel to the specific needs of the patient. A SUD specialty laboratory can assist with the setup of patient specific panels that targets a patient’s drugs of choice, avoids the detection of approved substances, and or verifies the appropriate use of other substances.
iv. Consult a SUD Specialized Toxicologists to verify the patient’s claim and or trouble shoot the matter.
v. Order chromatography testing. Clinicians that opt to forgo the first four practices in favor of chromatography testing do so at a greater cost, lost time that is critical to clinically appropriate SUD treatment, and most importantly the absence of the therapeutic benefits provided by the first four practices.
Use of the above practices enhances SUD treatment and can significantly, if not entirely, eliminate cross-reactivity ‘noise’. By limiting cross-reactivity ‘noise’, clinicians enjoy enhanced measurement based care that fosters improved patient outcomes in the form of a reduced relapse rate and increased education, employment, and housing rates. For more information on cross-reactivity, please contact your laboratory or Averhealth at info@Averhealth.com.

